This Ansible role is used in my blog series [Kubernetes the not so hard way with Ansible](https://www.tauceti.blog/post/kubernetes-the-not-so-hard-way-with-ansible-wireguard/) but can be used standalone of course. I use WireGuard and this Ansible role to setup a fully meshed VPN between all nodes of my little Kubernetes cluster. This VPN also includes two clients so that I can communicate securely with the Kubernetes API server. Also my Postfix mailserver running as K8s DaemonSet forwards mails to my internal Postfix through WireGuard VPN.
This Ansible role is used in my blog series [Kubernetes the not so hard way with Ansible](https://www.tauceti.blog/post/kubernetes-the-not-so-hard-way-with-ansible-wireguard/) but can be used standalone of course. The latest release is [available via Ansible Galaxy](https://galaxy.ansible.com/githubixx/ansible_role_wireguard). I use WireGuard and this Ansible role to setup a fully meshed VPN between all nodes of my little Kubernetes cluster. This VPN also includes two clients so that I can communicate securely with the Kubernetes API server. Also my Postfix mailserver running as K8s DaemonSet forwards mails to my internal Postfix through WireGuard VPN.
I used [PeerVPN](https://peervpn.net/) before but that wasn't updated for a while. As I moved my cloud hosts from Scaleway to Hetzner cloud it was a good time to switch the VPN solution ;-) In general PeerVPN still works perfectly fine esp. if you need a easy to setup fully meshed network (where every node is able to talk to all other nodes and even if node `A` should be able to talk to Node `C` via node `B` ;-) ). But PeerVPN needs also lot of CPU resources and throughput could be better. That's solved with [WireGuard](https://www.wireguard.io/).
leggewie
4 years ago
committed by